Soap and shampoo have no technology? Who said modern day soap and shampoo are “Indian products”? Which university did you graduate from?

There is a difference between the opinions that you stated and facts. Majority of what you stated is baloney (smoked sausage)! First you assume that anyone who wants to progress spiritually should not eat beef. Really? Do you have any supporting data? Second, are you suggesting that someone who wants to progress spiritually is superior to someone who does not want to do so? What if I do not want to progress spiritually but want to progress in taking care of other people and defending their rights to eat what they want and what they can afford? Then you state that eating meat leads to aggressiveness!

Hinduism does not need any guru. Most of the gurus that I know of are phony and self serving.

Homosexuality is not considered as a sickness or a disease by any reputable medical institution or organization in this world. You are simply being homophobic. What the “church” agrees is irrelevant. The “church” at one point thought that whites were superior to blacks and Indians, that slavery was ok and that women can be the property of men!

There are so many versions of the Ramayana written thousands of years apart. Which version of the Ramayana does it reference Muruga or Karthikeya? There are also so many different storylines of Ramayana (the Buddhist variant of Ramayana does not indicate an abduction of Sita. The obduction of Sita shows Ravana, who is beloved by the dark skinned people, in bad light). The original version in Sanskrit (approximately 4th century BC) does not mention Murugan. The Sanskrit version is also not written in a South Indian context.

It is a fairly simple statement. There was no one in India who considered himself to be a Hindu before the 15th century. There were Shivas, Vaishnavas, etc. But no Hindu.

I am not sure how your comments about the British are relevant to this article. History tells us that almost all countries that were under the British revolted at one point or the other. I agree that the Indian revolt was much more peaceful than the others. As you said this is partly due to a person named Gandhi. This person named Gandhi is now one of the hated persons by the modern Indian nationalists!

As I mentioned before, the Jonesian Theory (that is taught in Indian schools today and the theory that you believe in) is a British theory. So as per your own assumptions you like to wash the back of the British!

Dr. Ranjit Pal is an Indian and I think that his theory merits strong consideration.

Thank you for the comments. I am not sure if there is a correlation between eating meat and the ability to start a fire. A vast majority of living things that eat meat cannot create fire. So it is very conceivable in my opinion that human beings started eating meat before eating fruits and vegetables (obviously this issue is debatable). But what we know is that the intestinal tract of human beings are designed to process both meat and vegetables (this is rare in nature). This ability to survive on meat and/or vegetables gives us a critical edge over other living things.

I also do not see any difference between eating meat or vegetables from a “moral” stand point (vegetables and animals are living things and we are taking life every time we eat). People eat what is available where they happen to live.

You talk about similar sounding names to prove the Indian connection. You state “the deities Indra, Mitra, Varun.a, and Nasatya are Indian deities and not Iranian ones, because in Iran Varun.a is unknown and Indra and Nasatya appear as demons”. Actually Mitraism (worship of Mitra) was very common in the ancient world. The Romans called them Mysteries of Mithras and the Persians (modern day Iranians) call them Mithraism. So Mitra, Varuna and Indra were not exclusively Indian gods. Their compatriots are found in ancient Roman, Greek and Persian religions.

Indians like me want to find out the truth and not just believe in propaganda. So please stop being critical of “evil minded western scholars”. Indians like me are fully capable of looking at evidence and making rational judgments.

In what sense was he a prodigy?

You are completely wrong. Binayak Sen is no tribal nor a friend of the tribal people. He has very rich and powerful friends all over the world to support him. Most Indian tribals do not have this privilege. I do not know whether he is guilty or not. But I want him to stand trial (just like the rest of the people in India including the tribal people would if they were accused of a similar crime). I do not want his rich and powerful friends to bail him out. He is seeking special treatment. I want equality.

Here is the details.
In a treaty between the Hittites and the Mitanni, Indic deities Mitra, Varun. a, Indra, and N¹asatya (Asvins) are invoked. A clay text by a Mitannian named Kikkuli uses words such as aika (eka, one), tera (tri, three), panza (panca,¯ve), satta (sapta, seven), na (nava, nine), vartana (vartana, round). Another text has babru (babhru, brown), parita (palita, grey), and pinkara (pi _ ngala, red). Their chief festival was the celebration of visuva (solstice) very much like in India. It is not only the kings who had Sanskrit names; a large number of other Sanskrit names have been unearthed in the records from the area.

But is this language Indo-Iranian, Iranian or Indo-Aryan or to rephrase: did the Mittanis speak the PIE branch of India.That matter was settled in 1960 by Paul Thime
There are several reasons, but to be brief, I shall only give three: 1. the deities Indra,Mitra, Varun.a, and Nasatya are Indian deities and not Iranian ones, because in Iran Varun.a is unknown and Indra and Nasatya appear as demons; 2. the name Vasukhani makes sense in Sanskrit as a “mine of wealth” whereas in Iranian it means “good mine” which is much less likely; 3. satta, or sapta, for seven, rather than the Iranian word hapta, where the initial `s’ has been changed to `h’

According to H. Jacobi (who believed that the Mittanis came from India), since the worship of Vedic deities was happening in 14th century Mittani kingdom, it would have happened in India much earlier. Jamna Das Akhtar and P.E.Dumont thought that the dates were even earlier.

In fact there are many arguments in support of.Archaeologists have not found Central Asian, Eastern European or Caucasian culture in the Mittani kingdom. At the time same time they found the peacock motif – something which could have come from India. Based on this Burchard Brentjes argued that Indo-Aryans were settled in the Near East much before 1600 B.C.E.With all the trading relations between various parts of India and the Near East, dating as far back as 4000 BCE with the find of cotton in Dhuwelia and carnelian bead in Mesopotamia in the third millennium BCE, the migration of Indo-Aryans is not a fantasy tale.

Here,some evil western scholars ask us to believe that those Aryans on the way to India.If it is the case,how those Aryans use their emblem as Peacock very particular to India only.
How they celebrate a festivel which peculiar to India.I have given expert opinion also here.
How they have the name like Dasaratha which other Aryans like Persians not known using for.
Again,recent discovery of dried Saraswathi river as per Rigvedic details proves that the river dried in 1900BC,end of the Harappan era.
See,above details how fit with the clay tablet details outside India.It is proved drying of Saraswathi river forced Aryans to migrate in all directions.We see,near Turkey-Syria border Mittani Indo Aryans in 1700BC,200 years around from India to reach that place as Aryans moving as settlement.
It is no doubt those Mittanis were Harappans who had very close relation with Egyptian Pharaohs,in turn Pharaohs happened to be very ancient Solar dynasty Kings from India.That is why those Mittanis gave their daughters to Egyptian Pharaohs.
We can see those ancient Pyramid builders and Pharaohs of Egypt use to wear ‘U’ mark on their forehead.This is purely Vedic symbol.
True history is like this.But,evil minded western scholars knowingly repeat the lies many times to change as truth.
But,unfortunately,there are lot of Indians with little knowledge to believe those western lies

Aryan Invasion theory in India is the greatest fraud and fake story of last century.
Aryans Origins in India only
This is damn sure!